Is Janov Really One of the World’s Leading Psychologists?

Is Janov Really One of the World’s Leading Psychologists?

     This addresses one of the self published claims of primal therapy. The Primal Center’s website claims that “Dr. Arthur Janov is one of the world’s leading psychologists” (as of Jan 2011).  Is this actually true?  Is it misleading? According to what sources is it true? Do other psychologists consider him a leading psychologist?  This is relevant to the discussion on primal therapy because by saying he is one of top psychologists it implies a certain status or acceptance of primal theory. All I wish to do here is ask the questions, and leave them unanswered for the reader to decide. Let’s look at the data:

Evidence For Claim:

 1. Arthur Janov was listed on his PhD alumni Claremont Graduate College’s Hall of Fame Alumni, year 2000 inductees page. More than 100 other past graduates were also inducted in that single year.  Most or almost all of the names listed are not actually famous, despite the title “hall of fame.” Some of the names have “distinguished alumnus” by them;  Arthur Janov’s does not. Claremont Graduate College does not seem to be accredited currently by the American Psychological Association. Here is the link: http://alumnicommunity.cgu.edu/s/221/index.aspx?sid=221&gid=1&pgid=276

Notice the alumni contribution link at the bottom of this page.

Also see here that Janov’s PhD dissertation at Claremont in 1960 was a study about Jewish identification, a worthy subject but not exactly related to what he went on to do with his version of repressed memory retrieval therapy.

2. The number of books sold to date (The Primal Scream apparently sold more than a million).  

3. Past or present fame, Janov’s institute or center has had some celebrities, and he himself was relatively famous, and he or his therapy has been referred to in popular music and the media.

Evidence Against the Claim:

 1. Arthur Janov is not mentioned once in any known current (2002-2008) college textbooks on psychology. Those checked: Biopsychology, Pinel; Abnormal Psychology, Barlow; Idiots Guide to Psychology, Johnston; Psychology, Lefton; How to think Straight about Psychology, Stanovich; Personality Puzzle, Funder; Looking Out, Looking In, Adler, Proctor, Towne; The Developing Person, Berger; Introduction to Psychology, Kalat; Understanding Motivation and Emotion, (4th ed, 2005) Reeve. (2009 update: still never seen Janov mentioned once in psychology textbooks) 

2. Arthur Janov seems not to have authored any articles in any of the more than 100 peer reviewed psychology journals that are listed in “How to Think Straight About Psychology” by Stanovich, nor in any other scientific peer-reviewed journals.  Apparently he did have one article published in 1977 in a Psychosomatic journal that appeared to be an unscientific discussion on consciousness.

3. Arthur Janov is not featured in any of the lists in the study “The Top 100 Most Eminent Psychologists of the 20th Century,” Review of General Psychology, Haggbloom, et al. (2002, see below),  which was undertaken in conjunction with the American Psychological Association.  The lists were created by three different methods, one was by citations in college textbooks, another was by peer-reviewed journal citation frequency, and the third was done by survey (see the college textbook list at bottom of this page). Web-links: for a web-page with the lists and sources, see: http://edtech.tph.wku.edu/~shaggblo/tcl.htm  ; for a pdf of the whole article: http://www.uni.edu/~maclino/hs/documents/100eminent_psychologists.pdf

Rank

Corrected Rank

Name Citation Frequency

1

1

Freud, Sigmund

560

2

2

Skinner, B.F.

310

3

3

Bandura, A.

303

4

4

Piaget, Jean

240

5

5

Rogers, Carl

202

6

6

Schachter ,Stanley

200

7

7

Harlow, Harry F.

175

8

8

Brown, Roger

162

9

9

Miller, Neal E.

154

10

10

McClelland, D.C.

153

11

11

Erikson, Erik H.

151

12

12

Milgram, Stanley

146

13

13

Seligman, Martin E.P.

143

14

14

Maslow, Abraham

142

15

15

Bower, Gordon H.

138

 

16

Eysenck, Hans

130

16

17

Kohlberg, Lawrence

128

17

18

Watson, John B.

127

18

19

Allport, Gordon W.

124

19

20

Festinger, Leon

121

20

21

Loftus, Elizabeth F.

120

21

22

Zajonc, R.B.

118

22

23

Pavlov, Ivan P.

117

23

24

Kagan, Jerome

116

24.5

25.5

Sternburg, Robert J.

114

24.5

25.5

Mischel, Walter

114

26.5

27.5

Ekman, Paul

111

26.5

27.5

Hilgard, Ernest

111

28

29

Chomsky, Noam

106

29

30

James, William

104

30

31

Asch, Solomon

102

31

32

Aronson, E.

101

32

33

Janis, Irving L.

95

33

34

Lazarus, S.

91

34

35

Kelly, Harold

90

35

36

Scarr, Sandra

89

36

37

Cattell, Raymond B.

88

37

38

Bem, D.

85

38

39

Lorenz, Konrad

84

39

40

Jung, Carl

81

40.5

41.5

Rodin, Judith

79

40.5

41.5

Walster, E.

79

42

43

Wolpe, Joseph

75

43.5

44.5

Dement, William C.

74

43.5

44.5

Jones, Edward

74

45

46

Miller, George

72

46.5

47.7

Zimbardo, Philip

69

46.5

47.5

Tulving, Endul

69

48

49

Latane, Bib

65

49

50

Thorndike, Edward L.

63

50

51

Rosch, E.

60

51

52

Craik, F.

53

52.5

54

Synder, S.

52

52.5

54

Webb, W.

52

54.5 (16)

 

Eysenck, Hans

51 

54.5

54

Adler, Alfred

51

56

56

Jensen, Arthur

49

57

 

Orne, Martin

48

58.5

 

Neugarten, B.

47

58.5

 

Snyder, M.

47

61

 

Guilford, J.P.

46

61

 

Lamb, M.

46

61

 

Meichenbaum, D.

46

64

 

Masters, William

45

64

 

Selye, Hans

45

64

 

Sperry, Roger

45

66.5

 

Rubin, Z.

43

66.5

 

Freedman, J.

43

68

 

Cannon, W.B.

42

69

 

Kinsey, A.

41

70.5

 

Bruner, Jerome

36

70.5

 

Plomin R.

36

72

 

Neisser, Ulric

34

73

 

Darley, John M.

33

74.5

 

Lewin, Kurt

31

74.5

 

Hull, Clark

31

76

 

Berkowitz, Leonard

30

77.5

 

Kihlstrom, J.F.

28

77.5

 

Singer J.E.

28

80

 

Krasner, Leonard

27

80

 

Rosenhan, David

27

80

 

Dollard, John

27

82

 

Newcomb, Theodore

26

84.5

 

McCrae, R.R.

24

84.5

 

Buss, David M.

24

84.5

 

Hernstein, Richard J.

24

84.5

 

Kessler, R.C.

24

87

 

Gardner, Howard

21

88.5

 

Segall, M.W.

20

88.5

 

Squire, Larry R.

20

91.5

 

Eagly, Alice H.

19

91.5

 

Loenun, J.C.

19

91.5

 

Schaie, K.W.

19

91.5

 

Cacioppo, John T.

19

91.5

 

Beck, Arron.T.

19

95.5

 

Gazzaniga, Michael S.

18

95.5

 

Hyde, J.S.

18

95.5

 

Berry, J.W.

18

95.5

 

Kitayama, S.

18

99.5

 

Spanos, N.P.

17

99.5

 

Zigler, E.

17

99.5

 

Ebbinghaus, Herman

17

99.5

 

Izard, C. E.

17

102

 

Greenwald, A. G.

16

________________________________________________________________

               Is Janov Really a Psychiatrist? Scientific Neurology Researcher?

The blurb on Amazon.com for the book on depression called The Janov Solution , as of Sept 2007 stated:

“About the Author:
Dr. Arthur Janov, a psychiatrist and well-known author, has completed over thirty years of scientific research in neurology and psychotherapy that form the basis for The Janov Solution. In addition to The Primal Scream, Dr. Janov has authored nine other books, many of which are also best-sellers.”

This is false advertising and in violation of the APA ethics code (see ETHICS, section 5).

Here are some questions about this:

1. When and where did Arthur Janov get a medical degree to qualify him as a psychiatrist?

(he didn’t, he has a 1960 PhD. in clinical psychology does not qualify him to prescribe medications for any psychological disorder)

2. What neurological research did Janov do that was published in a peer-reviewed neurological article or textbook?

(he didn’t) 

3. And if so did this neurological peer review citations span the 30 years claimed?

4. Which books apart from The Primal Scream were bestsellers? 

5. How is bestseller defined and which bestseller list is being quoted?

6. What scientific research has Janov had published in a peer-reviewed journal?  (none as far as I can find)

7. If so, does this peer review record extend for thirty years?

________________________________________________________________

2 Comments to “Is Janov Really One of the World’s Leading Psychologists?”

  1. Thanks for your comment, David A. Goodman,

    I respect, but do not agree in the way you generalize neurological ideas or findings to things that I consider religious or pseudoscientific. I don’t agree with your using neurology language to add legitimacy to primal therapy, for example. But also your book “Hidden Neurology of the Lord’s Prayer” goes beyond the bounds of scientific method and falsifiability. There is science between neurology and larger scale behavior – and that science is called psychology. Psychological science and social psychology are essential areas to learn to prevent someone inferring pseudoscientific meaning from basic neurology. I’m concerned that the public may be misled if our PhD’s and MDs promote pseudoscience whilst still emphasizing their doctorate privaledges.

    I appreciate your efforts in your own privately conducted research, but I am skeptical, and that skepticism in science has been an important protector of the public in the past. For example, even though you claim to be a neurologist, that gives the public the impression you have been working in a hospital or a research university – some such venue similar to that. However, the article here: NC Times, explains that you have in fact been doing your own unfunded independent research on your own sleeping rhythms and dreams. You created the name “Newport Neuroscience Center”, and I am not sure people realize that that entity is not a neuroscience center in the typical meaning of that word. From the article I read on the link above, the Newport Neuroscience Center seems to have been conducted out of a trailer. Is this correct? That is okay, but it is not what the name envisions.

    In addition, I have looked for articles by you at PsycINFO – a comprehensive database on psychology and neuroscience articles. I only found one publication in the time period from 1980 to 2011. The article chronicled 20 years of sleep in a person with a disorder, apparently the author of the article. This is okay, but this peer-reviewed record does not necessarily indicate expertise in evaluating clinical psychology treatments, nor does it illustrate a consistent career as a neurologist as we commonly understand the term to mean.

    Primal therapy began as a type of therapy shortly before 1970, it is not 3000 years old. There is no evidence from anywhere in literature, science, or history that the idea that traumatic memories are repressed ever existed before the romantic period in western Europe (about the time of Freud). see http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=658136

    I do not agree with your assertion that only a neurologist would understand what you mean. I have met several university professors who’s main focus is neuroscience, and not one of them would agree with you on primal therapy. You know this, and everybody in academia knows this – but will this mislead the public?

    Take no offense at this commentary, the public tends to be the winner when critical thinking is allowed in science. If it were not for wanting to prevent the public from being mis-informed, I would be totally okay with your endorsement of primal therapy.

    thanks for posting,

    Editor, Debunking Primal Therapy

  2. As a long-time commentator and research associate for Arthur Janov, I feel that ignorance is not bliss. It is impossible to discuss the mechanisms and results of Primal Therapy with a non-neurologist. I am perfectly willing as a Neuroscientist (first published paper in 1962) to answer in depth any confusion that lingers about the power and potential of Primal Therapy, now 3,000 years since it was discovered.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.